It is indeed incorrect to state cinema emancipates itself from preceding art forms; it is my assertion that the stasis of the theatre, and how it manifests through filmic aesthetic, is linked to cinematic fluidity – a movement towards a new form of representation that builds on the foundations of the theatre whilst making use of technological advances and the aesthetic potential of cinema. Therefore, in order to better understand early Italian filmmaking, it is more pertinent to explore points where the ‘theatrical’ and the ‘cinematic’ converge; I shall do this through exploring how spectacle and narrative work together. I intend to examine the relationship between both factors and examine how ‘theatrical stasis’ and ‘cinematic fluidity’ (movement) typified Early Italian filmmaking. I shall explore my thesis chronologically, with reference to La presa di Roma (Alberini: 1905), Cabiria (Pastrone: 1914), and Maciste all’inferno (Brignone: 1925), examining how theatricality manifests itself through cinematic space, theatrical acting through movements such as divismo, and theatrical furnishings through editing, sound and lighting.
Wood defines cinematic space as constructing a ‘habitus in which […] architecture [and] interiors […] “define our way of living space”’ (2005: 186). It is this notion of ‘defining our way of living space’ that provides the ideological context for all three films under question, as the need to (re)define Italian identity, italianità, pervaded Early Italian Cinema following the unification. This can be clearly seen in La presa di Roma, in which there is a striking sense of realism through the dramatic historical reconstruction of the Capture of Rome (1870) and the operatic visual spaces. This is an example of the spectacle created by the interplay between the theatrical stasis of the set and cinematic fluidity, as the film uses immobile props to
oscillate between the static, immortalised past of Italy and the moving, unfurling central narrative action, aided by the lens, which visually guides the audience through an event that played a major part in defining modern Italy. In General Kanzler’s office, a static long-shot is used in order for the full mise-en-scène to be viewed by the audience, much like they would view a theatre piece – in which several static props on the stage set contextualised the central; moving narrative action. Here, this shot visually converges past and present temporalities and points to the ontology of the lens. In the background, we can see a static representation of the past, including the portrait of Pope Pius XI, a major figure of the Papal States, and a painting of a matronly figure, perhaps Joan of Arc, who led France to victory after the Hundred Years’ War. The stasis of the cinematic set provides spectacular narrative context to the unfurling, moving narrative action in the foreground. This underlines the power of the lens in early Italian cinema, as it was a tool that was able to simulate movement, through a reel of static shots, utilising theatrical aesthetics and new technology to create a new mode of representation. In this shot, through the cinematic space we can see a visual display of power, with the Pope occupying the highest area of visible space, as if an omniscient force that overviews every decision made by the General, who is situated between the painting of the Pope and the warfare painting, connoting that he is shaped by the pressures of war. We then have the soldiers, who are framed by the doorway, suggesting regimentation and orderly conduct. Here, cinematic space is intrinsically linked to the stasis of the theatre, not only telling a visual story, but allowing the audience to better understand the narrative through the static props of the set and how individuals inhabit, and move within, their cinematic space. Therefore, a spectacle is created through the central moving narrative action and the static theatricality of the set. This points to the wider context of Early Italian filmmaking as there was a conscious effort to reinvent the nation through a dramatic depiction of one shared; collective past. Hence, the acting and placement of the soldiers is significant as they, much like actors on a stage, act as moving pawn pieces for the director to add to enhance the mise-en-scène. The movement of cinematic bodies against a static backdrop creates cinematic depth, generating a spectacular aesthetic that creatively reinforces the film’s diegesis.
Due to the lack of intradiegetic sound in early cinema, there was a heavy emphasis on theatricality in order to ensure that the audience’s interest was maintained; as well as the spectacle of the set, this was developed through acting and costumes. The spectacle here is the ability to capture ‘history truly’ (Rhodes: 2000: 310). Through the cinematic fluidity of characters moving in their surroundings, we gauge a better narrative understanding. For example, in this long-shot (right), Alberini uses the actors to tell a visual story. Our immediate view is drawn to the central third, with a line of extras running over the rubble of the broken wall. The characterisation feels very regimented – whilst the majority of actors occupy the centre of the shot, they are framed by the bodies around them. In the mid to bottom-right third of the shot, there is a cadaver that creates a dramatic motif of death. Moreover, narrative tension is created as the camera is positioned in such a way that we cannot see what the soldiers see, and a set of hermeneutic codes ensue as we begin to wonder what fate awaits the soldiers. In this sequence, Rome itself plays a significant role in the film, as, whilst chaos erupts around the actors, it remains the one constant factor. As such, this points to Rudolph Arnheim’s notion that ‘the environment shares in the [narrative] action,’ (1957: 161). The city acts as the operatic set of the story, subjecting itself to the cinematic gaze of the viewers and provides an almost photographic, and therefore static, representation of Rome. If the city shares in the acting, then there is indeed an interplay between narrative and spectacle, as it not only forms a central part of the aesthetic, but also reinforces the narrative and the events that led to the final result of the Siege of Rome. Actors are used to develop the fluidity of the central narrative, aided by the dramatic extradiegetic music, but it is the omnipresence of Rome that reinforces questions of national identity and a shared collective past.
The way that the film is edited serves to highlight the synergy between narrative and spectacle: the parsing of the chapters simultaneously heightens the theatricality of the narrative, providing a visual movement towards the denouement of the film. This visual division of the chapters into distinct ‘acts’ is evocative of the theatre in that it both sets up the viewing experience and corresponds to the gradual change of pace in the extradiegetic music. If this film were to take place in the theatre, it would be much longer, given the need for constant set changes. Cinema allowed early filmmakers to collate every aspect of the theatre in a fluid; succinct way through making use of continuity editing, which tells a visual story, using static theatrical influences, such as interludes, along with the cinema’s technical; fluid aspects to create something truly new. In sequence one (below), a long-shot of the Ponte Milvio is used, and as a carriage rides off-scene, the music begins to change – from dramatic, reverberating piano chords to the use of a dramatic drum beat, which is an audial signifier of the army and warfare, signalling what is to follow. This is reinforced by the visual parsing of the chapters, and viewers are moved from observing cinematic movement to a static sequence of dramatic titles, and a still image, that momentarily move us out of the visual narrative, whilst simultaneously serving to reinforce it by providing further explanation. After this shot, we are then taken into sequence two, comprised of static titles and images. The dramatic music slowly fades out as the national anthem of Italy enters, giving a very nationalist sentiment to the denouement of the film, highlighting how intradiegetic experience reinforced national sentiments. Under this specific light, the stasis of dramatic images works together with the audial movement towards the narrative ‘apoteosi’ – moving us from tense music to the joyous tones in the Italian national anthem. Here, a narrative resolution is established through the spectacle of fluid audial and visual editing and the theatrical stasis of the images and on-screen text; both factors help to leave the viewer with a lasting image of the film’s narrative sequence.
It is this notion of defining national identity during a period of national questioning that is the focus of the historical epic film Cabiria, looking outwards at the observances of the ‘Other’ (Said: 1978), in order to reflect on Italy’s national identity. The film features an erupting volcano, conflagrations, kidnapping and sieges that take place against the backdrop of the film’s extravagant, cinematic space. This space is intrinsically theatrical, and it tells a spectacular visual story that works alongside the narrative of the film. The left still exhibits a very clear theatrical influence, with the high-priest figure commandeering the sacrifice of young girls; here the camera is static to illustrate the spectacular stage-like set design. This sequence is then cut to a long take of the temple, in which we can see a spectacular, theatrical set design and an incredible depth of focus. The fluidity of continuity editing works together with static shots of the operatic mise-en-scène to establish a narrative sequence that consciously builds tension and distresses the audience. Further, although the camera is static, the interior of the temple is rife with movement, and the lower-third of the shot’s composition is crowded with ‘savages’ that applaud as young girls are sacrificed. It is this simultaneous emotional investment with the narrative and appreciation of the set design that highlights how theatrical and narrative aspects work together, aligning the cinematic and colonialist gaze, as the films aesthetic encourages us to partake in the narrative of siege and conquest, much like La Presa di Roma, underlining how ‘the injustice and cruelty of a city that sacrifices little girls […] sets up dramatic oppositions, law/disorder, justice/injustice. From quite early in the film, the connotations of good […] stack up on the Roman side; Africans and Orientals are bad.’ (Wood: 2005: 68)
Via theatrical acting, evocative of commedia dell’arte, we can understand the role of the ‘diva’. Indeed, the phenomenon of divismo ‘emerged in Italy in the 1910s, predominantly with the female stars who came to epitomize much of Italian silent cinema. The diva, here Italia Almirante Manzini, became a distinguished feature of Early Italian cinematic iconography. The diva’ was highly sexualised and subjected to the Male Gaze (Mulvey: 1975: 12), and engendered the filmic version of a femme fatale. This type of characterisation illustrates how theatrical stasis was taken to a new level by means of early cinematic representation; as technology began to move forward, a distinguished star system developed, the camera providing a filmic form of scopophilia. An interesting depiction of how narrative and spectacle work together to inform the representation of divismo can be observed in the sequence entitled ‘Queen Sophonisba’s dream’. Here, we see her dreaming of being eaten by the statue of Kronos, whilst a maid operates the lowest part of the shot. The bifurcation of the composition is interesting – whilst the top half of the shot acts as the dramatic materialisation of her dream, we see her in real life below – allowing us to see her fear materialised against the backdrop of a static black background, suspending it in time and space, creating both a visual spectacle and justifying her unrest in the lower-third of the shot. Moreover, her positioning and her draped clothing sexualises her; she is the decadent spectacle of this shot, and her beauty is foregrounded against the theatrical apparition of her nightmare. Here, both factors work together to illustrate her qualms, and reality operates on two distinct levels – whilst we are rooted in narrative ‘reality’, we see the materialisation of the supernatural. The ability of early cinema to create a fantastical, dream-like world highlights how theatrical acting was used to engross viewers in a spectacular diegesis, where a synergy was created between the scripted; static nature of the acting and the movement of these characters within the confines of their cinematic space.
The creation of a dream-like world is rooted in the special effects used in this film, which work to reinforce certain aspects of the narrative sequence. For example, the long-shot of an erupting Mount Etna in which the only movement is visible in the top-left third and the bottom-right third of the mise-en-scène. This provides a spectacular juxtaposition between two and three-dimensionality, as we see the two-dimensional line of extras foregrounded against the three-dimensionality of the volcano. Much like in Maciste all’inferno, special effects allowed filmmakers to creatively tell a visual story to the viewers without the impediment of theatrical equipment. Cinematic fluidity and the use of a new form of spectacle moved a static aesthetic experience to a complex, fluid and three-dimensional one. In the shot above, Pastrone creatively uses visual effects of smoke and fire erupting from the volcano and manipulates light against the dark mise-en-scène; chiaroscuro, much like a spotlight draws our attention to a specific part of the stage. Whilst the shot is static, it is what is moving within this shot that is significant – encouraging us to observe the spectacle of the volcano and reminding us of the subjective narratives of the extras fleeing from the eruption. This draws the viewers’ eyes to two distinct segments on opposing ends of the shot as we see the spectacle and the narrative working together to establish one coherent storyline. Whilst Pastrone sought to define italianità, examining Italy’s colonial feats through lavish; deep sets, the use of the special effects in this specific example provides a grandiose backdrop that illustrates the extensive budget of the film and contextualises the narrative. The bifurcation of the mise-en-scène highlights the relationship of narrative and spectacle: whilst the backdrop reminds us of the static theatricality of the film, we are vested in the moving narrative of the characters. The spectacle of moving special effects here form an intrinsic part of cinematic space, illustrating early film’s potential to harness theatrical influences and take them to new heights, thus creating a gripping narrative that simultaneously thrills and tells a visual story.
Indeed, much like Cabiria, Brignone’s Maciste all’inferno harnesses the theatricality of the stage through its incredible cinematic depth of focus, allowing the audience to see a meticulously-designed set that serves to represent Dante Alighieri’s Inferno as Maciste takes a trip to Hell. Cinematic space in this film illustrates how theatrical stasis and filmic fluidity can work together, as the mise en scène of Italian films ‘exploits the possibilities of environment and artistic heritage. […] Artists delighted in the artistic possibilities of the recreation of space, but had difficulties in harmonizing the depiction of realistic space with the demands of the visual plane of the story.’ (Wood: 2005: 184). The camera’s potential to glide through a three-dimensional space illustrated the magical potential of cinema as a new creative medium that took preceding modes of representation to new heights. For example, in the shot above, we see Maciste chained to a wall after being tricked by the King of Hell. In the foreground of the shot, we see the eponymous character struggling, shrouded in lateral light, allowing us to see the
three-dimensionality of the set. In the background, we see the ethereal figure of Pluto’s wife Prosperina emerge from the shadows, framed by Maciste and the rocks. The incredible depth of the shot illustrates the aesthetic potential of early cinema as a mode that was able to take artistic visual expression to new; spectacular heights via the fluidity of the camera. Antonello da Messina’s St Jerome in his Study (c. 1450-55) illustrates how the artist attempted to depict movement by manipulating perspective; through his use of layering, he creatively illustrates movement in a static painting. This influence manifests itself in early Italian filmmaking, where the director acts as the new artist. In this specific shot, our perspective is manipulated by cinematic space and the framing of the shot as we see Prosperina walk towards Maciste. A series of cuts are used here, reminding us that the fluidity and linearity of narrative time is subject to continuity editing that strings together several different static shots to create one moving timeline. Hence, early Italian filmmaking fuses preceding modes of representation with the technological advances present within early visual culture, allowing them to directly solicit ‘spectator attention, inciting visual curiosity, […] supplying pleasure through an exciting spectacle’ (Gunning: 1989: 58) that simultaneously engrosses the viewer in the narrative plight of Maciste and the theatricality of the set. Theatrical, and indeed artistic, stasis manifest here through the director’s ability to manipulate space and time through playing with the spectator’s perspective via cinematic equipment, much like in Marcel Fabre’s Amore Pedestre (1914). Here, space is used to illustrate the power of the camera in controlling our perspective as we see a story unfold between two pairs of feet, as a brief comparison. Filmic space acts as an advancement of artistic space, not only aiding the lens to depict movement and three-dimensionality within a deep set, by means of continuity editing, but simultaneously immersing spectators in the diegesis of the film.
The fact that the audience of Early Italian filmmaking was able to so actively engage with Bartolomeo Pagano’s character of Maciste, the unexpected hero of the film Cabiria, underlines how a film’s aesthetic was inextricably linked to the narrative. He became an iconic figure for Italy in the early twentieth century, as he symbolised ultimate strength and resilience, defying ‘the shortcomings in the nature of Italian character, plagued by indolence (ozio), excessive individualism, and effeminacy.’ (Reich: 2015: 4) In Maciste all’inferno, this legacy is continued. How, then, does the spectacle of the star, iconography and costume work alongside the narrative? This film has an interesting visual depiction of the different roles attributed to the ‘divo’ and the ‘diva’; whilst the former became a national icon, bound up by classical iconography of: ‘mens sana in corpore sano – a healthy mind in a healthy body’ (Reich: 2015: 6), the latter’s identity is highly sexualised. In the left shot, we can see this gendered division. In the left-third, we can see Prosperina’s dramatic costume, and her headdress, evocative of Queen Sophonisba in Cabiria, whilst Maciste takes central precedence in this shot, giving him increased cinematic agency and creating narrative tension as we hope he is not tempted by the powers of Hell. It is this emotional investment with the narrative that illustrates the creative aims of the film – to endeavour to explore the modern-day Italian man; whilst Hell is rife with seductive powers, it is ultimately upholding society’s values, such as adhering to dominant familial ideologies, that is applauded by the film. This is reinforced by the final sequence of the film, when a mid-shot of Maciste and his child is used, which provides a narrative resolution to the film. Hence, the star is used as a mechanism that reinforces societal ideologies of the time, and the divo/a became an intrinsic part of their ‘habitus’ in the sense that we know the narrative is resolved when we see Maciste and his child reunited in a domestic space away from the peril of Hell. The visual theatricality of the star on a spectacular set grabs viewers’ attention, illustrating how the star had the potential to resonate with the times. The film doesn’t simply reject the past but rather uses it, and the popular figure of Maciste, who ‘played a crucial role in Italian cinema’s narrativization of a unified identity’ (Reich: 2015: 2) in order to reconceptualise the nation, moving society from a period of stagnation and national questioning to a time of unity.
Whilst special effects were a part of major theatre productions, early cinema took them to a new level through continuity editing. This film exerts a clear theatrical, and therefore static, influence, but makes use of cinematic fluidity to create a fantastical world, where anything is possible. Here, there is a heavy influence of trick films, short films designed to feature innovative special effects. The above sequence illustrates how spectacle and narrative worked together to create a supernatural feel to the film. Brignone first uses a long-take of two bodies rolling down a hill, he then uses smoke to shroud their bodies as he cuts to the second shot. The two figures then break through the top central-third of the shot, followed by the final long-shot of them falling into the spectacular set of Hell. Whilst illustrating the power of editing and special effects, this sequence points to the way that stasis and movement worked together – each shot is static and has been placed on a reel to simulate movement, and special effects heighten the theatricality of this movement. Further, we can see how early filmic expression advanced the stasis of the theatre through the fluidity of the editing, and this particular example enhances the narrative action as we are moved from the security of the uniformity of preceding shots on Earth to the chaos erupting below in Hell. On a stage, this would take many set changes to create, whereas the cutting of static shots into a continual reel creates a seamless transition in which a series of static images are strung together to simulate movement. Here, this movement allows the opulent set to come to life and tell a visual story, creating a fluidity between Italy and Hell.
Herein, I have discussed how the spectacle of early Italian filmmaking was heavily influenced by theatrical and artistic stasis, how the stasis of the stage formed a central part of the early filmic mise-en-scène, and how the visual spectacle created by the films under question shores up and contextualises the central narrative action. The films of Brignone, Pastrone and Alberini actively demonstrate the relationship between cinematic narrative and visual spectacle. By ascribing theatrical modes of deconstruction, we are able to see how preceding visual culture formed a central part of Early Italian filmmaking. The potential of this type of cinema was not to move away from theatrical stasis, but rather to use it in order to move forwards to the future. It is through acting and the early star system that these films were able to resonate an audience in search of a national identity. Theatrical space and furnishings remind us that cinema was highly exploratory and endeavoured to refashion static influences of the theatre to create a visual spectacle that reinforced the central narrative. Editing and special effects serve to highlight the technological potential of the lens, as something that was revolutionary in setting up the viewing experience by simulating movement, so much so that extra-cinematically we question where one can draw the line between the ‘cinematic’ and the ‘theatrical’. In truth, Early Italian cinema combined static theatrical elements and cinematic fluidity to create a truly innovative experience that simultaneously visually gratified audiences and absorbed them in a gripping diegesis. It was through this symbiosis that the cinema of this period was truly able to define and mould modern cinematic culture.